| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

FrontPage

Page history last edited by gary@... 15 years, 3 months ago

COGS 200: Spatial cognition at multiple scales

Image credit

 

Course rationale

Awareness has been steadily increasing of the involvement of spatial cognition in many areas and levels of cognitive function.  Most famously, the discovery of place cells, and even less intuitively, grid cells, have brought to the fore questions of how we process and represent the spaces we dwell in and our place within them.  Since there are relatively few researchers studying space and spatial cognition at UCSD, this course will try to serve as a means of exposing the UCSD community to recent developments related to spatial cognition, and where these results might fit within cognitive science more broadly.  We will try and cover all "levels" of spatial cognition, from low level models of synaptic LTD/LTP to high level research on navigation and spatial memory.

 

COGS 200, Fall 2008

Spatial cognition at multiple scales

(Course # 628285)

Fridays, discussion: 2-2:50, lecture: 3-4:30, CSB 003 (location: http://tinyurl.com/4jtpcw)

Course Requirements

 

1. Attendance

Students are expected to attend all lectures and participate in all discussion sections. That said, if you have a conflict for one or two talks over the course of the quarter, it is acceptable to miss class.

Students should also create a profile page and put it in the folder "Student Pages".  It should include their name, year, and a brief description of their interests (e.g. Smith, John )

 

2. Readings

Readings for each week will be posted on the course website. Usually two papers.

As preparation, students are asked to read:

Burgess, N. (2008). Spatial cognition and the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1):77-97.  Burgess 08 Spatial.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.002

Mcnamara, T. P., Sluzenski, J., and Rump, B. (in press). Human spatial memory and navigation. In Roediger, III, H. L., editor, Cognitive Psychology of Memory, volume 2 of Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, pages 157-178. Elsevier.  McNamara 08 Human.pdf

3. Thought Papers

Students are expected to choose two lecture topics they are particularly interested in and to write a short reaction paper (~1200 words) to the readings for each of those weeks. These papers are intended to help students synthesize their thoughts on the readings, and consequently improve the quality of our discussion. Thought papers should be added as a page in the "Week X Thought Papers" folder, and linked to from their profile page (e.g. in Week 2: John Smith - Spatial Cognition and Kittens ).  

4. Class Discussion

Each student should choose one week for which they will help lead the pre-lecture discussion section. Students are welcome to lead discussion the same week they write one of their thought papers.  Update: As mentioned during the first class, students are expected to extend their class participation by making a brief comment on the content of each talk (e.g. as visible here: Gramann abstract and talk page).

 

Talks Schedule

All talks are 3-5pm on Fridays in CSB 003.

 

 

Date

Name

Institution

Title

Readings

9/26

Klaus Gramann

Swartz Center for Cognitive Neuroscience

“Reference frames in spatial navigation”

Abstract and talk page

Klatzky RL (1998) Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa C, Habel C, and Wender KF (eds.) Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge, pp. 1–17. Berlin: Springer.  Klatzky 1998 LectNotesCompSci.pdf

Kahana, M.J., Sekuler, R., Caplan, J.B., Kirschen, M., Madsen, J.R. (1999). Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation. Nature 399, 781-784.  Kahana et al 1999 Nature.pdf

10/3

Andrea Chiba

UC San Diego, Dept. of Cognitive Science

"The rodent as a model system for examining theories of spatial cognition."

Talk page

Goodrich-Hunsaker, N. J., Howard, B. P., Hunsaker, M. R., and Kesner, R. P. (2008). Human topological task adapted for rats: Spatial information processes of the parietal cortex. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 90(2):389-394.   Goodrich-Hunsaker 08 Human.pdf

 

Rogers, J. L. and Kesner, R. P. (2006). Lesions of the dorsal hippocampus or parietal cortex differentially affect spatial information processing. Behavioral neuroscience, 120(4):852-860.  Rogers 06 Lesions.pdf

10/10

Daniel Montello

UC Santa Barbara, Dept. of Geography

"The Role of Regions in the Spatial Cognition of the Earth's Surface"

Abstract and talk page

Friedman, A. and Montello, D. R. (2006). Global-scale location and distance estimates: common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 32(2):333-346.  friedman_06_globalscale.pdf

 

Montello, D. R., Goodchild, M. F., Gottsegen, J., and Fohl, P. (2003). Where's downtown?: Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 3(2):185-204.  montello_03_wheres.pdf

10/17

Brock Kirwan

UC San Diego, Larry Squire Lab

“Memory, Amnesia, and Spatial Navigation”

Abstract and talk page

Wolbers, T.; Wiener, J.M.; Mallot, H.A. & Büchel, C. (2007). Differential recruitment of the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the human motion complex during path integration in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(35), 9408-9416.  Wolbers 07 Differential.pdf
 
Shrager, Y., Kirwan, C.B., & Squire, L.R. (2008). The neural basis of the cognitive map: Path integration does not requir ehippocampus or entorhinal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(33):12034-12038.  Shrager 08 Neural.pdf

10/24

Nora Newcombe

Temple University, Dept. of Psychology

"Eight Reasons to Doubt the Existence of a Geometric Module (and Where to Go Next)"

Abstract and talk page

Cheng, K. and Newcombe, N. S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1):1-23.  Cheng 05 Is-there.pdf

 

Learmonth, Amy, E., Newcombe, Nora, S., Sheridan, Natalie, Jones, and Meredith (2008). Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. Developmental Science, 11(3):414-426.  Learmonth 08 Why-size-counts.pdf

10/31

Stefan Leutgeb

UC San Diego, Dept. of Biology

"Memory storage in cognitive maps."

Talk page

Leutgeb, S. and Leutgeb, J. K. (2007). Pattern separation, pattern completion, and new neuronal codes within a continuous ca3 map. Learn. Mem., 14(11):745-757.  Leutgeb 07 Pattern.pdf


Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., and Tanila, H. (1999). The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron, 23(2):209-226.  Eichenbaum 99 Hippocampus.pdf

11/7

Timothy McNamara

Vanderbilt University, Dept. of Psychology

"Sketch of a Theory of Human Spatial Memory & Navigation"

Talk page

Kelly, J. W., Mcnamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., and Rieser, J. J. (in-press). The shape of human navigation: How environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation. Cognition Kelly in-press Cognition.PDF

 

Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., and Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 30(1):142-157.  Mou 04 Allocentric.pdf

11/14

Teenie Matlock

UC Merced, Dept. of Cognitive Science

"On the dynamics of aspect and motion events"

Talk page

Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & cognition, 32(8):1389-1400.  Matlock 04 Fictive.pdf

 

Matlock, T. and Fausey, C. M. (under review). Can grammar win elections?

11/21

Lucia Jacobs

UC Berkeley, Dept.of Psychology

"The evolution of hippocampal function"

Abstract and talk page

Jacobs, L. F. (2003). The evolution of the cognitive map. Brain Behav Evol, 62(2):128-139.  Jacobs 03 Evolution.pdf

 

Waisman, A. S. and Jacobs, L. F. (2008). Flexibility of cue use in the fox squirrel (sciurus niger). Animal cognition, 11(4):625-636.  Waisman 07 Flexibility.pdf

12/5

Doug Nitz

UC San Diego, Dept. of Cognitive Science

“Parietal cortex and the mapping of space”

Abstract and talk page

Nitz, D. A. (2006). Tracking route progression in the posterior parietal cortex. Neuron, 49(5):747-756.  Nitz_2006_Neuron.pdf

 

Brozovic, M., Gail, A., and Andersen, R. A. (2007). Gain mechanisms for contextually guided visuomotor transformations. J. Neurosci., 27(39):10588-10596.  Brozovic_Gail_Andersen_JNS_2007.pdf

 

*This outline modified from COGS200 spring quarter 08

Comments (2)

Nancy Owens Renner said

at 11:14 pm on Nov 24, 2008

Who wants a final discussion—to integrate what we've learned and link it to our own interests?

What is your availability Monday, December 8 or Tuesday, December 9?

If we want, we could invite some of our UCSD faculty to help answer our questions and tie together loose ends.

Leo Trottier said

at 1:11 pm on Dec 1, 2008

My schedule is flexible. I am not available on Mondays 3-4, or Tuesedays at 1.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.